<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finished. Time To Start Over.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/</link>
	<description>Your basic design blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Dixon</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255631</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255631</guid>
		<description>I just found your blog through your Iconic set of icons (very nice, btw), and after reading this post I must say that I fully agree with your sentiments. I&#039;ve always been a fan of sharing ideas and art on the web, using forums for actual discussion, and just generally, slowing down to think. Nothing turns me off more than Twitter or blogs that re-blog everybody else&#039;s re-blogs. 

My own blog is not nearly as sophisticated as yours, but I can empathize with the desire to generate real content to spur ideas and discussion. 

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found your blog through your Iconic set of icons (very nice, btw), and after reading this post I must say that I fully agree with your sentiments. I&#8217;ve always been a fan of sharing ideas and art on the web, using forums for actual discussion, and just generally, slowing down to think. Nothing turns me off more than Twitter or blogs that re-blog everybody else&#8217;s re-blogs. </p>
<p>My own blog is not nearly as sophisticated as yours, but I can empathize with the desire to generate real content to spur ideas and discussion. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Keir</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255513</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 02:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255513</guid>
		<description>I like, I&#039;ve always been a fan of content focused themes rather then flashy ones.

People only come for the glitter once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like, I&#8217;ve always been a fan of content focused themes rather then flashy ones.</p>
<p>People only come for the glitter once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Perehinec</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255278</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Perehinec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255278</guid>
		<description>This theme fits the mood of the blog perfectly. I have always had trouble finding a background that suited the ambiance of my blogs. I have tried to design my own themes but could never come up with something that I liked, particularly.

Another problem I had was finding a size that would accomodate everyone, not only that but the CSS wouldn&#039;t work well with IE for some reason, only firefox, so just as most other people, I just found a theme (I guess settled on a theme) is more like it. 

You did well here. It looks good and works well with your blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This theme fits the mood of the blog perfectly. I have always had trouble finding a background that suited the ambiance of my blogs. I have tried to design my own themes but could never come up with something that I liked, particularly.</p>
<p>Another problem I had was finding a size that would accomodate everyone, not only that but the CSS wouldn&#8217;t work well with IE for some reason, only firefox, so just as most other people, I just found a theme (I guess settled on a theme) is more like it. </p>
<p>You did well here. It looks good and works well with your blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yeastinfections</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255277</link>
		<dc:creator>yeastinfections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255277</guid>
		<description>i think  it&#039;s a brilliant redesign. A lot of hard work - but in the end it always pays off.
I am perfectionsit sa well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think  it&#8217;s a brilliant redesign. A lot of hard work &#8211; but in the end it always pays off.<br />
I am perfectionsit sa well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somerandomdude</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255264</link>
		<dc:creator>somerandomdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255264</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kellie&lt;/strong&gt; - Yeah, I have to agree that part of me misses those elements as well. The problem from my point of view though is that those elements were never fully flushed out, nor did they ever really ad anything to the underlying purpose of the site. Yes, they were fun, but they were fun without any reason and were never executed to the level where it was truly engaging. 

Ultimately, I spent more time on those UI knick-knacks than the core experience of engaging with the content. I loved the idea of an interactive background and it is something I am very open to trying again. However, the end result was something I was never happy with. In the end, they were distractions as well as a blight to the code-cleanliness of the site. I am happy to see them go.

I think the main feedback I got from the old site was how cluttered it was. I knew that no matter what I did, the sheer amount of content on the home page was always going to come off more cluttered than other blog home pages. That said, there was so much fluff on the old design that I definitely wasn&#039;t aiding in my cause. Removing extra colors and visual elements has helped. In terms of spacing, it definitely is tight, but from my subjective opinion, I feel as though the current iteration is &lt;em&gt;less&lt;/em&gt; tight than the old version while gaining an extra 30 pixels of effective horizontal space (more on this later).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kellie</strong> &#8211; Yeah, I have to agree that part of me misses those elements as well. The problem from my point of view though is that those elements were never fully flushed out, nor did they ever really ad anything to the underlying purpose of the site. Yes, they were fun, but they were fun without any reason and were never executed to the level where it was truly engaging. </p>
<p>Ultimately, I spent more time on those UI knick-knacks than the core experience of engaging with the content. I loved the idea of an interactive background and it is something I am very open to trying again. However, the end result was something I was never happy with. In the end, they were distractions as well as a blight to the code-cleanliness of the site. I am happy to see them go.</p>
<p>I think the main feedback I got from the old site was how cluttered it was. I knew that no matter what I did, the sheer amount of content on the home page was always going to come off more cluttered than other blog home pages. That said, there was so much fluff on the old design that I definitely wasn&#8217;t aiding in my cause. Removing extra colors and visual elements has helped. In terms of spacing, it definitely is tight, but from my subjective opinion, I feel as though the current iteration is <em>less</em> tight than the old version while gaining an extra 30 pixels of effective horizontal space (more on this later).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255262</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255262</guid>
		<description>P.J—

What can I say? Congrats on fulfilling a HUGE goal. Redesigning anything that is already good, especially your own work, is no easy stroll in the park.

I will admit that at first, I was very sad to see the slider bars, column color shifts, and graphical stats of the previous site go away. I felt those design elements were great, giving SRD a distinct, quirky personality even though I know you had a completely different opinion about it. Before becoming bummed out to see the old look go, I spent some time this afternoon and evening, exploring the new site. Lets just say that we got acquainted with each other, and are now friends.  :-)

I&#039;ve come to realize that the site is still very similar to the former SRD. This familiarity is comforting. What has changed—for the better—is that SRD grew up and became an adult. Stripped of all the misc effects, the look and feel is now direct, sophisticated, functional, and focused upon the content. 

The typography treatment in the header is elegant and fits well with this new found maturity. Most importantly, I think it brings depth to the monochromatic color scheme. As a print designer, that is my favorite design element of the site. It keeps a bit of that playful personality that I grew to enjoy on SRD. I am also glad to see the icons have survived the redesign, as well as the distinct grid structure. The only nitpicky question I have is this: Why did you decided to leave so little space between the 3 main columns? They do seem cluttered, especially on the homepage. I&#039;ve always felt that negative space is a significant part of legibility as well as a key to successful hierarchical structures. 

Otherwise, this is a successful redesign. I look forward to exploring the site further, as well as reading the new content. Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.J—</p>
<p>What can I say? Congrats on fulfilling a HUGE goal. Redesigning anything that is already good, especially your own work, is no easy stroll in the park.</p>
<p>I will admit that at first, I was very sad to see the slider bars, column color shifts, and graphical stats of the previous site go away. I felt those design elements were great, giving SRD a distinct, quirky personality even though I know you had a completely different opinion about it. Before becoming bummed out to see the old look go, I spent some time this afternoon and evening, exploring the new site. Lets just say that we got acquainted with each other, and are now friends.  :-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve come to realize that the site is still very similar to the former SRD. This familiarity is comforting. What has changed—for the better—is that SRD grew up and became an adult. Stripped of all the misc effects, the look and feel is now direct, sophisticated, functional, and focused upon the content. </p>
<p>The typography treatment in the header is elegant and fits well with this new found maturity. Most importantly, I think it brings depth to the monochromatic color scheme. As a print designer, that is my favorite design element of the site. It keeps a bit of that playful personality that I grew to enjoy on SRD. I am also glad to see the icons have survived the redesign, as well as the distinct grid structure. The only nitpicky question I have is this: Why did you decided to leave so little space between the 3 main columns? They do seem cluttered, especially on the homepage. I&#8217;ve always felt that negative space is a significant part of legibility as well as a key to successful hierarchical structures. </p>
<p>Otherwise, this is a successful redesign. I look forward to exploring the site further, as well as reading the new content. Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somerandomdude</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255259</link>
		<dc:creator>somerandomdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255259</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. This criticism of blogging is directed equally towards myself - I was pumping out tons of content, but none of it was unique or intellectually fulfilling. I consider it akin to fast-food. In the future weeks, I will be talking about why this is so bad for us and how I myself got caught up in this process. 

I&#039;m happy that you like the current design. My hope is this is the last iteration you will see from this site in a long, long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. This criticism of blogging is directed equally towards myself &#8211; I was pumping out tons of content, but none of it was unique or intellectually fulfilling. I consider it akin to fast-food. In the future weeks, I will be talking about why this is so bad for us and how I myself got caught up in this process. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy that you like the current design. My hope is this is the last iteration you will see from this site in a long, long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Riveros</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Riveros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255258</guid>
		<description>P.J. -

Nice implementation of your theme.  Especially, dig the overlays and sliding door effect.  Was a big fan of the prior design, as well.

As someone who is not a designer nor coder, I have been dragging my feet on my own blog because of the same concerns you expressed in this post.  I ask myself -- why should I add more of the sameness to the web? 

But, I am encouraged by the efforts being made on the typography front, by the desire by some in the design community to add *editorial direction* to their blog posts, and the general desire to put the idea of craft back into blogs -- whether thematically, or by design or by content.

Hopefully, over the next year there will be a *new wave* of blogs or personal sites with stronger author generated content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.J. -</p>
<p>Nice implementation of your theme.  Especially, dig the overlays and sliding door effect.  Was a big fan of the prior design, as well.</p>
<p>As someone who is not a designer nor coder, I have been dragging my feet on my own blog because of the same concerns you expressed in this post.  I ask myself &#8212; why should I add more of the sameness to the web? </p>
<p>But, I am encouraged by the efforts being made on the typography front, by the desire by some in the design community to add *editorial direction* to their blog posts, and the general desire to put the idea of craft back into blogs &#8212; whether thematically, or by design or by content.</p>
<p>Hopefully, over the next year there will be a *new wave* of blogs or personal sites with stronger author generated content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somerandomdude</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255255</link>
		<dc:creator>somerandomdude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255255</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Martijn&lt;/strong&gt; - It has been a pet peeve of mine for some time and I thought what better way to get back into the blogging process than to critique the current state of the blogging process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Martijn</strong> &#8211; It has been a pet peeve of mine for some time and I thought what better way to get back into the blogging process than to critique the current state of the blogging process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://somerandomdude.com/articles/art-ideas/finished-time-start/comment-page-1/#comment-255253</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=4982#comment-255253</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that I fully agree with you about the fact that the writing structures on blogs generally should be changed. I also think that people who write blogs should be more carefull with what they write, because I see a lot of blogs who just copy the content from other blogs.

Anyway, I&#039;m looking forward to the changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that I fully agree with you about the fact that the writing structures on blogs generally should be changed. I also think that people who write blogs should be more carefull with what they write, because I see a lot of blogs who just copy the content from other blogs.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m looking forward to the changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
